Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Federal Appeals Court Deals Major Blow to Voting Rights

NNPA NEWSWIRE — This decision focuses on Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and is expected to be challenged and appealed to the Supreme Court. Experts said Section 2 is critical in preventing discriminatory voting practices based on race. The 8th Circuit’s decision says that Section 2 does not have a “private right of action.” This means that private groups cannot effectively challenge actions that might violate the voting rights of minorities.

voting rights
The practical implication of this decision is a significant constriction of the safeguards embedded in the Voting Rights Act. (Photo: iStockphoto / NNPA)

By Stacy M. Brown
NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

A federal appeals court issued a ruling on Monday that could have serious consequences for the Voting Rights Act. The ruling suggests that the enforcement measures of the Act, which have historically supported minority representation in American politics, may be reduced. The 8th Circuit’s decision states that only the federal government has the right to sue under an important part of this civil rights law. It excludes private citizens and civil rights groups from this authority.

This decision focuses on Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and is expected to be challenged and appealed to the Supreme Court. Experts said Section 2 is critical in preventing discriminatory voting practices based on race. The 8th Circuit’s decision says that Section 2 does not have a “private right of action.” This means that private groups cannot effectively challenge actions that might violate the voting rights of minorities.

If this decision remains valid, it may lead to a significant reduction in the protections provided by the Voting Rights Act. Private parties, civil rights groups, voters, and political entities have used Section 2 over the years to challenge issues like redistricting and voter ID requirements.

ADVERTISEMENT

The practical implication of this decision is a significant constriction of the safeguards embedded in the Voting Rights Act. Private entities have played a significant role in holding states accountable for discriminatory practices. Section 2 has been particularly effective for them in this regard. The US Supreme Court recently emphasized the significance of Section 2 in an important case about redistricting in Alabama. This required the state to change its congressional map in order to give Black voters more political power.

Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Written By

ADVERTISEMENT
E. coli outbreak linked to McDonald's Quarter Pounder hamburgers
A severe E. coli outbreak in multiple states has been traced to Quarter Pounder hamburgers served by McDonald's. (Scripps News)
0 seconds of 37 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:37
00:37
 

Read The Current Issue

Texas Metro News

Determining Optimal Protein Intake For Muscle Growth buy steroids the 3 golden rules of muscle growth
ADVERTISEMENT

You May Also Like

News

By: Norma Adams-Wade Congratulations still are  in order for Arthur Fleming of Dallas — long-time civil and human rights advocate and former NAACP Dallas...

News

By Stacy M. BrownBlackPress of Americahttps://blackpressusa.com/ The NNPA World News app has unveiled the Missing & Black 2025 Campaign, a nationwide initiative aimed at...

Editorial

Black Press blasts corporate America racist policies Washington, DC – The National Newspaper Publishers Association (NNPA), representing the Black Press of America, has announced the...

Superb Woman

Nia Symone is an on-air personality, entrepreneur, and trailblazer in media, known for her role as the host of HBCU GO. She earned an...

Advertisement